Taphoi wrote:We do not know the exact cremation process employed, so we do not really know what its results would have been.
We do, however, know that the source of fuel for cremations had to have been whatever was available GÇô wood GÇô and, as has been pointed out by Mary Renault (of all people); it would take an enormous amount of heat to melt or burn all the flesh off a body, let alone reduce a skeleton to GÇ£
little more than a pile of small fragmented bones." The
Archaeology article states that GÇ£
after cremation, dry bones are more or less complete, whereas fleshed bones are more or less fragmented.GÇ¥ Is it likely that an average open-air wood funeral pyre would have had such an effect? Or whether it was even intended to reduce the bones to such a state?
The following on ancient cremations from
Funeral Customs by Bertram S. Puckle (1926)
In considering cremation we must distinguish between the funeral pyre of the ancients and of primitive peoples, and the modern methods of scientific incineration.
The earliest pyre was merely a heap of wood upon which the body was placed, and in most cases only half destroyed, for it is no easy matter to reduce to ashes a body containing a large percentage of fluid matter. This altar-like erection must have been very nearly related to the pagan sacrifice of human and animal offerings to the gods, and may have had something to do with the Christian attitude.
Pine or other resinous wood was selected, and some light combustible materials added such as dried grass and twigs, in order to set the pyre alight. Oak and hard woods generally, that resist the flames, take twice as long in producing the same results. With these materials oil, pitch, etc., were in later use, adding much to the heat and effectiveness of the flames.
Christianity found the Romans building their pyres of pine logs constructed altar-wise. The interstices were stuffed with pitch and brushwood to which sweet-smelling gums were added, the structure being decorated with the symbolic branches of cypress. When all was prepared the uncoffined body was placed in position, and the chief mourner, with head averted, set fire to the pyre with a torch. When the whole was reduced to ashes, wine was poured on the embers to cool them. The bones were then reverently collected, washed with milk and placed with perfume in a cinerary urn.GÇ¥
IGÇÖd add to the above that not only was there the problem of the body containing a large percentage of fluid matter, but half of the weight of freshly cut logs is also water. TodayGÇÖs cremation procedures reduce the bones to tiny fragments and particles; however, this happens at a temperature ranging between 1400 and 2100 degrees. When a wood fire is reduced to charcoal the charcoal burns and emits heat when the inner temperature of the fire reaches around 1000 degrees. Given the amount of fluids involved in the body and the wood I figure it would take considerable time and a great reduction in the mass of wood before such a temperature would be reached. We also donGÇÖt know exactly
when wine or other liquid was poured on the embers to cool them - a Greek as well as a Roman custom. If this was done at the point that the wood was first reduced to charcoal then it seems logical that the bones would survive fairly intact. Walter Burkett in Greek Religion (Page 191) says there was no intent to fully destroy the corpse by means of cremation.
Inhumation and cremation are found side by side in the same place GÇô in Crete they even appear together in the same grave; in the accompanying ritual and in the grave goods no difference can be detected; nor is the purpose to destroy the corpse, for the bones are collected all the more piously and preserved in an urn. To explain the varying usage, we find ourselves thrown back on possible external factors GÇô such as wood shortage GÇô or simply unpredictable fashion; a change in religious belief can no more be invoked than a difference in tribe.
After Chaeronea Philip sent the bones of 300 Athenians back to Athens; I truly doubt that sufficient heat was applied to this many bodies to fragment them. Imagine how many trees would have been needed for such a mass cremation; plus there was the burial of the Macedonian dead at the site as well, although hiistory doesnGÇÖt tell us if they were cremated first. I know that the burial site has been interred, but donGÇÖt know where to access any archaeological evidence on this. Anyway GÇô and back to the Athenian corpses - I wouldnGÇÖt be surprised if burnt flesh still adhered in places, necessitating scraping of the bones as well as washing them before final internment. In the case of royal burials there would have been a single body on a large pyre, but can we be sure that the heat produced would have been efficient enough to GÇ£
warp and bear curved fractures as a result of the retraction of relatively fresh collagen during cremationGÇ¥ as stated in the article. (HephaistionGÇÖs funeral pyre, as described, might have been an exception, but the pyre in itself was an exception.) The
Department of Archaeological Sciences at Bradford University conducted an experiment in the reconstruction of GÇ£prehistoricGÇ¥ funeral pyres, but I canGÇÖt find any conclusions for evidence of the effect on a body. There was another
bronze age recreation performed less scientifically in 2004, but again the conclusions are missing. So . . .
if a fairly complete skeleton could have been rescued from a royal funeral pyre, is it not possible that knives were used to scrape residual burnt flesh off the bones of the occupant in Tomb II, thereby causing the knick on the eye socket?
Taphoi wrote:I am deeply sceptical, as a scientist, about the dry cremation theory.
Well, all my ramblings above signify that IGÇÖm in agreement with you on this, however I donGÇÖt have a strong personal conviction as to who is in each tomb. IGÇÖd say I'm equally interested in general Macedonian funeral procedures as I am in the occupants of the tombs. For instance, why were the Macedonian dead buried on the battlefield at Chaeronea? Athenian bones were sent back to their city, why not the Macedonian dead? It isnGÇÖt as if the distance was too great, as in Asia.
Best regards,
Amyntoros
PS to Paralus GÇô Many thanks for the article link!