pothos.org

agesilaos wrote: 'Krateuea' for Krateros is a suggested emendation but it is not in the manuscript tradition so given the other anomalies seems an unwarrented edit.

Emendation of any text, without an extremely sound basis, is never recomended: such may licence the invention of history.

I have since modified my view, slightly, of the Macedonian right at Sellasia given long discussion with "Xenophon". The settled paper and (unfortunately) hand described map is on it's way.

Taphoi wrote: You should also look at the exchanges of populations between Europe and Asia in the Last Plans (Diodorus 18.4), which are also fairly likely to come from Cleitarchus and which I have argued are perfectly genuine despite the doubts of Tarn.

I'd be interested in the evidence that Diodorus' summary of the Babylonian Settlement - including the annulment of the hypomnemata - "fairly likely" comes from Kleitarchos.

'Thou, scurrillous rogue,' there is no evidence and little likelhood; but it is simple to reconstruct the line of thinking.

Book XVII of Diodoros is generally credited as substantially Kleitarchos
Curtius too used Kleitarchos extensively and he ended his history with an account of the dissension at Babylon
therefore Kleitarchos covered Babylon.
Diodoros XVIII covers events in Babylon and is therefore also 'likely' to be Kleitarchan.

Herendeth the concatenation of false logic...Amen

agesilaos wrote:Herendeth the concatenation of false logic...Amen

Forsooth, thine own musings had that conclusion come to. That evidence, prayeth of a more substantial nature, be adduced promoted the inquiry.

Sir Scurrilous Rogue,
Marquis d'Makedone,
Sir Anthony Abbott of Warringah's Great Southern Realm.