Andrew Chugg - help!
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2004 1:14 pm
Hi Andrew,
Hopefully youGÇÖre still around and may be able to assist me, (not excluding anyone else that may help) with understanding a passage that comes from Plutarch. I noticed you mentioned in a previous post you were writing a manuscript on the links between Achilles and Alexander, so hopefully you can be of some assistance.PlutarchGÇÖs book on Pyrrhus king of Epirus commences his narrative with the usual account of the royal houseGÇÖs legendary origins and explains how the descendants of Achilles came to rule over the region. He then goes on to say; GÇÿThis was how it came about that Achilles was granted divine honours in Epirus and was known as Aspetus in the nomenclature of that region.GÇÖI was wondering if you had come across the name *Aspetus* else where in your research? I know Achilles as a child was known as Ligyron and that AchillesGÇÖ child Pyrrhus later came to be known as Neoptolemos but I donGÇÖt seem to be able to find any information on the name Aspetus; I must add, my research is far from exhaustive. Is this name unique to the people of Epirus as suggested by Plutarch or can its association be found else where? Plutarch continues on; GÇÿHowever, the later kings of this line sank into barbarism and as a result of the decline of their power and the insignificance of their lives, the dynasty lapsed into obscurity. It was Tharrhypas, so the historians say, who was the first of the successors to make himself famous by introducing Greek customs and letters and who imposed order on the life of his cities by promulgating humane laws. Tharrhypas was the father of Alcetas and his son Arrybas married Troas, who bore him AecidesGÇÖ.Unfortunately, Plutarch does not mention the names of the historians he uses, and as per usual, great care need be taken in accepting the passage as being accurate and true.
But given that there is some truth in what he states, and I may be wrong in saying this, but it certainly suggests to me, a period of Hellenisation occurred amongst the Molossians, and not more than a generation or two before Olympias gave birth to Alexander. Bearing this in mind, would then the name Achilles be simply a case of syncretism for Aspetus, and in a rather comical play on a much debated issue, was it indeed Aspetus that Alexander was attempting to emulate as opposed to Achilles?Sorry about the last line! But in all seriousness, does the narrative by Plutarch pose any questions about the veracity of such stories regarding Al
Hopefully youGÇÖre still around and may be able to assist me, (not excluding anyone else that may help) with understanding a passage that comes from Plutarch. I noticed you mentioned in a previous post you were writing a manuscript on the links between Achilles and Alexander, so hopefully you can be of some assistance.PlutarchGÇÖs book on Pyrrhus king of Epirus commences his narrative with the usual account of the royal houseGÇÖs legendary origins and explains how the descendants of Achilles came to rule over the region. He then goes on to say; GÇÿThis was how it came about that Achilles was granted divine honours in Epirus and was known as Aspetus in the nomenclature of that region.GÇÖI was wondering if you had come across the name *Aspetus* else where in your research? I know Achilles as a child was known as Ligyron and that AchillesGÇÖ child Pyrrhus later came to be known as Neoptolemos but I donGÇÖt seem to be able to find any information on the name Aspetus; I must add, my research is far from exhaustive. Is this name unique to the people of Epirus as suggested by Plutarch or can its association be found else where? Plutarch continues on; GÇÿHowever, the later kings of this line sank into barbarism and as a result of the decline of their power and the insignificance of their lives, the dynasty lapsed into obscurity. It was Tharrhypas, so the historians say, who was the first of the successors to make himself famous by introducing Greek customs and letters and who imposed order on the life of his cities by promulgating humane laws. Tharrhypas was the father of Alcetas and his son Arrybas married Troas, who bore him AecidesGÇÖ.Unfortunately, Plutarch does not mention the names of the historians he uses, and as per usual, great care need be taken in accepting the passage as being accurate and true.
But given that there is some truth in what he states, and I may be wrong in saying this, but it certainly suggests to me, a period of Hellenisation occurred amongst the Molossians, and not more than a generation or two before Olympias gave birth to Alexander. Bearing this in mind, would then the name Achilles be simply a case of syncretism for Aspetus, and in a rather comical play on a much debated issue, was it indeed Aspetus that Alexander was attempting to emulate as opposed to Achilles?Sorry about the last line! But in all seriousness, does the narrative by Plutarch pose any questions about the veracity of such stories regarding Al