After Hydaspes
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:26 am
Dear Dean,Due to other obligations I am at present unable to devote adequate time to studies. I am in full agreement with Nick when he says, GÇ£My view is that indeed something terrible happened at the Hydaspes that our sources are not clear about.GÇ¥ This battle, more than any other, shattered Greek/Macedonian morale and this is where they came closest to defeat. I think that I have already made it clear that it was only due to JonesGÇÖ mistaken identification of Palibothra with Patna in eastern India that after the mutiny Alexander appeared to be running away from the Prasii. The fact is that, as he had vowed after the mutiny, he did confront the Prasii and defeat them. But that was in Gedrosia and as it turned out from later events he could not decimate the Prasii. Nick is probably not aware that CraterusGÇÖ job may have been to secure the rear of the enemy(Prasii/ Massagetae). This was a multi-pronged attack which shows superb planning not characteristic of a defeated general. That the Massagetae (Masaka of the Indians), were in this area is clear (see the maps of the Encyclopedia of Islam). These people were well known as fierce fighters and the desert terrain made their positions invincible. The problem of logistics was brilliantly solved by Alexander by the naval operation. Note that the army was ordered to keep near the shore-line and the navy moved almost in tandem. The horses and foodgrains on the ships were all intended to support the army. It may be that in Hydaspes also the aura surrounding Alexander ulimately made a difference. He was not only the vanguard of Hellenism but even to many Indians he was a patron of Buddhism which was very similar. This was realised only by Tarn.With best regards,Dr. Pal