marcus wrote:It doesn't say that Stasicrates proposed the project before 331BC, although it does suggest it was some time prior to Hephaistion's death (at which time it is mentioned by Plutarch).
Could have been prior to 331 'cause Strabo (who also mentions the Mount Athos project) says Stasicrates (Cheirocrates) was the architect of the rebuilt temple at Ephesus. Assuming, reasonably, that he and Alexander were in communication at that time it seems likely he would have brought up the subject.
Strabo Book XIV. Chapter I. 23. Ionia. Ephesus.
After the completion of the temple, which, he says, was the work of Cheirocrates (the same person who built Alexandria, and also promised Alexander that he would form Mount Athos into a statue of him, which should represent him as pouring a libation into a dish out of an ewer; that he would build two cities, one on the right hand of the mountain, and another on the left, and a river should flow out of the dish from one to the other,)* - after the completion of the temple, he says that the multitude of other sacred offerings were purchased by the Ephesians, at the value set on them by artificers, and that the altar was almost entirely full of the works of Praxiteles. They showed us also some of the performances of Thraso, namely, the Hecatesium, a Penelope, and the old woman Eurycleia.
Then there's the quote from the Moralia's On the Fortune or the Virtue of Alexander II.
Plutarch, Moralia 335c—f Among the other artists at his court was Stasicrates the master-sculptor, not seeking to make something flowery or pleasant or lifelike to look upon, but employing a magnificence in workmanship and design worthy of a king's munificence. He followed Alexander into Asia and found fault with the paintings, sculptures, and moulded likenesses that had been made of him, on the ground that they were the works of timid and ignoble artists. "But I, your Majesty," said he, "have conceived the project of placing your likeness in living and imperishable material, with roots that are everlasting and weight immovable and unshakable. For Mount Athos in Thrace, in that part where is its highest and most conspicuous summit, has well-proportioned surfaces and heights, limbs and joints and proportions that suggest the human form. When it has been properly carved and worked into shape, it can be called Alexander's statue, and Alexander's statue it will be; with its base set in the sea, in its left hand it will encompass and hold a city with ten thousand inhabitants, and with its right pour from a bowl of libation an ever-flowing river down into the sea. But as for gold and bronze, ivory, wooden timbers, and dyes, which make those paltry images that can be bought and sold, stolen, or melted down, let us reject them all!" Alexander listened to his words and admired but declined with thanks the lofty designs and the boldness of the artist. "But," said he, "let Athos remain as it is. It is enough that it be the memorial of the arrogance of one king; but my imprint the Caucasus shall show and the Emodian range and the Tanaïs and the Caspian Sea; these will be the image of my deeds.
Now, I know that Plutarch may have been putting words into Alexander's mouth but I suspect that had the conversation taken place at a later date then Alexander's "image of my deeds" would have encompassed much more than is listed above.
Best regards,