Sekandar in persian sources isn't Alexander

This moderated forum is for discussion of Alexander the Great. Inappropriate posts will be deleted without warning. Examples of inappropriate posts are:
* The Greek/Macedonian debate
* Blatant requests for pre-written assignments by lazy students - we don't mind the subtle ones ;-)
* Foul or inappropriate language

Moderator: pothos moderators

Post Reply
Cyrus

Sekandar in persian sources isn't Alexander

Post by Cyrus »

Name of Alexander exists in persian texts (eg "Alexander I" who was macedonian genereal of Xerxes), I don't see any reason for changing it to Sekandar.
Sekandar (egyptian "Sekhanre") was son of the Egyptian Pharaoh Nectanebo. We know that there was a macdonian king with name of Alexander III in his army but he was Sekandar who conquered the persian empire. Alexander was killed in a battle in india but Greeks killed Sekandar in Babylon.
User avatar
Polyxena
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Macedonia
Contact:

Re: Sekandar in persian sources isn't Alexander

Post by Polyxena »

Is this some competition for the best joke???Than... thanks to make me laught :-)
Poliksena_atg
It's better to be a lion for a day than a sheep all your life.
Tre

Re: Sekandar in persian sources isn't Alexander

Post by Tre »

Of course you realize in the Romances, Alexander is said to be the son of Nectanebo. Note that the Romances are stylized fiction based very loosely on the story of Alexander.
Nicator
Hetairos (companion)
Posts: 704
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:27 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Sekandar in persian sources isn't Alexander

Post by Nicator »

oh, Tre...did u have to be the party pooper! We were just getting used to the concept that Alexander came from Egypt and died in India...darn it! Nick W. will love this guy!)later Nicator
Later Nicator

Thus, rain sodden and soaked, under darkness cloaked,
Alexander began, his grand plan, invoked...

The Epic of Alexander
ruthaki
Strategos (general)
Posts: 1229
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 5:31 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Re: Sekandar in persian sources isn't Alexander

Post by ruthaki »

First prize for the funniest myths!
aen
Pezhetairos (foot soldier)
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:31 am

Cyrus. Apropos your last post on Egypt.

Post by aen »

Just thought I'd repost my message here as threads can disappear very quickly in the forum.You mentioned a revolt.Around 331 there was indeed a revolt - this was shortly before Alexander crossed into the Persian sphere. Its ringleader was a guy called Khabash (if not Egyptian, Ethiopian), and I seem to recall he stormed and took Memphis, ousting its then Persian governor/satrap/whathaveyou. He had about a year's quiet before the Persian fleet sailed up the Nile delta to put their house back in order. This they did, quashing Khabash and co, and staying put for another year or so to keep a close watch on things, before having to depart in a rush to try to intercept Alexander's crossing of the Hellespont. They were late.You make the point that it appears strange that Alexander didn't meet stiffer Persian resistance; if they controlled Egypt why didnt they defend it more rigorously?First of all, they had only just regained nominal control of the place; besides they were not popular with the priestly classes who were themselves the bedrock of Egyptian political thought. Secondly, other Persian held regions had capitulated just as fast further to the north, and now, with the gruesome examples of Tyre and Gaza laid down as a marker for what future resistance could expect, there could be no sense in trying to slug it out with the Macedonians. Sounds to me like the Persian source you cite confused Khabash with Alexander and rolled them both into one.Laters.
Post Reply